$\bf{
1680 \pm20}$
|
OUR ESTIMATE
|
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$1663$ $\pm5$ ${}^{+16}_{-4}$ |
|
|
|
BES3 |
$1656.8$ $\pm4.9$ |
|
1 |
|
RVUE |
$1683$ $\pm7$ $\pm9$ |
|
2 |
|
BELL |
$1678$ ${}^{+5}_{-3}$ $\pm7$ |
|
3 |
|
RVUE |
$1673$ $\pm5$ |
|
4 |
|
BES3 |
$1680$ ${}^{+12}_{-13}$ $\pm21$ |
1.8k |
5 |
|
BES3 |
$1662$ $\pm20$ |
|
6 |
|
SND |
$1641$ ${}^{+24}_{-18}$ |
|
|
|
SND |
$1667$ $\pm5$ $\pm11$ |
3k |
7 |
|
CMD3 |
$1700$ $\pm23$ |
2k |
8 |
|
SND |
$1674$ $\pm12$ $\pm6$ |
6.2k |
9 |
|
BABR |
$1733$ $\pm10$ $\pm10$ |
|
10 |
|
BABR |
$1689$ $\pm7$ $\pm10$ |
4.8k |
11 |
|
BELL |
$1709$ $\pm20$ $\pm43$ |
|
12 |
|
BABR |
$1623$ $\pm20$ |
948 |
13 |
|
CMD2 |
$\sim{}\text{ 1500}$ |
|
14 |
|
RVUE |
$\sim{}\text{ 1900}$ |
|
15 |
|
RVUE |
$1700$ $\pm20$ |
|
16 |
|
RVUE |
$1657$ $\pm27$ |
367 |
|
|
DM2 |
$1655$ $\pm17$ |
|
17 |
|
DM2 |
$1680$ $\pm10$ |
|
18 |
|
DM1 |
$1677$ $\pm12$ |
|
19 |
|
DM1 |
1
From a VDM fit to ZHU 2023 ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ data with two resonances, ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$, and a third resonance with mass $1850.7$ $\pm5.3$ MeV and width $25$ $\pm35$ MeV of 1.7 $\sigma $ statistical evidence.
|
2
From a fit using a vector meson dominance model with contributions from ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ and non resonant contribution.
|
3
From the analysis of the combined measurements of ${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{)}$ from BaBar, Belle, BESIII, CMD3.
|
4
From a partial wave amplitude analysis at $\sqrt {s }$ = 2.125 GeV which includes all the possible intermediate states that match $\mathit J{}^{PC}$ conservation in the subsequent two-body decay. The intermediate states are parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner functions. Statistical error only.
|
5
Seen in ${{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ decay with branching ratio ${{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit X}}{{\mathit \eta}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \eta}}$ = ($12.0$ $\pm1.3$ ${}^{+6.5}_{-6.9}$) $ \times 10^{-6}$.
|
6
From a fit using a vector meson dominance model with contribution from ${{\mathit \rho}{(770)}}$, ${{\mathit \omega}{(782)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(1020)}}$, ${{\mathit \omega}{(1420)}}$, ${{\mathit \rho}{(1450)}}$.
|
7
From a fit with coherent interference of the ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$ with a non-resonant contribution.
|
8
Assuming the ${{\mathit K}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}^{*}{(892)}}$ + c.c. dynamics. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.
|
9
Using a vector meson dominance model with contribution from ${{\mathit \phi}{(1020)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$, and higher mass excitations of ${{\mathit \rho}{(770)}}$ and ${{\mathit \omega}{(782)}}$.
|
10
Using events with ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ invariant mass less than 0.85 GeV.
|
11
From a fit with two incoherent Breit-Wigners.
|
12
From the simultaneous fit to the ${{\mathit K}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}^{*}{(892)}}$ + c.c. and ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \eta}}$ data from AUBERT 2008S using the results of AUBERT 2007AK.
|
13
From the combined fit of AKHMETSHIN 2003 and MANE 1981 also including ${{\mathit \rho}}$, ${{\mathit \omega}}$, and ${{\mathit \phi}}$. Neither isospin nor flavor structure known.
|
14
Using data from IVANOV 1981, BARKOV 1987, BISELLO 1988B, DOLINSKY 1991, and ANTONELLI 1992.
|
15
Using the data from BISELLO 1991C.
|
16
Using BISELLO 1988B and MANE 1982 data.
|
17
From global fit including ${{\mathit \rho}}$, ${{\mathit \omega}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}}$ and ${{\mathit \rho}{(1700)}}$ assume mass 1570 MeV and width 510 MeV for ${{\mathit \rho}}$ radial excitation.
|
18
From global fit of ${{\mathit \rho}}$, ${{\mathit \omega}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}}$ and their radial excitations to channels ${{\mathit \omega}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$, ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$, ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ , ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \pi}^{\mp}}$. Assume mass 1570 MeV and width 510 MeV for ${{\mathit \rho}}$ radial excitations, mass 1570 and width 500 MeV for ${{\mathit \omega}}$ radial excitation.
|
19
Fit to one channel only, neglecting interference with ${{\mathit \omega}}$, ${{\mathit \rho}{(1700)}}$.
|