$\bf{
2164 \pm5}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
|
$2164.7$ $\pm9.1$ $\pm3.1$ |
|
1 |
|
BES3 |
$2178$ $\pm20$ $\pm5$ |
|
2 |
|
BES3 |
$2190$ $\pm19$ $\pm37$ |
|
3 |
|
BES3 |
$2163.5$ $\pm6.2$ $\pm3.0$ |
|
4 |
|
BES3 |
$2177.5$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm19.5$ |
|
5 |
|
BES3 |
$2126.5$ $\pm16.8$ $\pm12.4$ |
|
6 |
|
BES3 |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$2215.7$ $\pm8.3$ |
|
7 |
|
RVUE |
$2169$ $\pm5$ $\pm6$ |
|
8 |
|
RVUE |
$2273.7$ $\pm5.7$ $\pm19.3$ |
|
9 |
|
BES3 |
$2135$ $\pm8$ $\pm9$ |
95 |
|
|
BES3 |
$2239.2$ $\pm7.1$ $\pm11.3$ |
|
10 |
|
BES3 |
$2200$ $\pm6$ $\pm5$ |
471 |
|
|
BES3 |
$2180$ $\pm8$ $\pm8$ |
|
11, 12 |
|
BABR |
$2079$ $\pm13$ ${}^{+79}_{-28}$ |
4.8k |
13 |
|
BELL |
$2186$ $\pm10$ $\pm6$ |
52 |
|
|
BES |
$2125$ $\pm22$ $\pm10$ |
483 |
|
|
BABR |
$2192$ $\pm14$ |
116 |
14 |
|
BABR |
$2169$ $\pm20$ |
149 |
14 |
|
BABR |
$2175$ $\pm10$ $\pm15$ |
201 |
12, 15 |
|
BABR |
1
Seen in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}^{0}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ with a significance of 3.2$\sigma $.
|
2
From a fit to the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ cross section between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV with a sum of Breit-Wigner amplitude and a non-resonant contribution.
|
3
By a simultaneous fit of the ${{\mathit K}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(1430)}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ and ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ intermediate channels in a partial-wave analysis, assuming the same structure, modelled with a coherent sum of a nonresonant component and a resonant component by a Breit-Wigner function.
|
4
From a fit to the cross section below 3.5 GeV measured by BaBar and BESIII with a coherent sum of two modified Breit-Wigner amplitudes (${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$ and ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$) and a nonresonant term.
|
5
From a fit using a coherent sum of a phase-space modified Breit-Wigner function and a phase-space term.
|
6
By a simultaneous fit of the intermediate channels in a partial-wave analysis, assuming the same structure, modelled with a coherent sum of a nonresonant component and a resonant component by a Breit-Wigner function.
|
7
From a VDM fit to ZHU 2023 ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ data with two resonances, ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$, and a third resonance with mass $1850.7$ $\pm5.3$ MeV and width $25$ $\pm35$ MeV of 1.7 $\sigma $ statistical evidence.
|
8
From the analysis of the combined measurements of ${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{)}$ from BaBar, Belle, BESIII, CMD3. The statistical significance for ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ is 7.2 $\sigma $.
|
9
From a fit to the cross section between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV with a sum of Breit-Wigner amplitude and a nonresonant contribution. The observed structure can be also due to ${{\mathit \rho}{(2150)}}$.
|
10
The observed structure can be due to both the ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ and ${{\mathit \rho}{(2150)}}$.
|
11
Fit includes interference with the ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$.
|
12
From the ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$ component.
|
13
From a fit with two incoherent Breit-Wigners.
|
14
From the ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$ component.
|
15
Superseded by LEES 2012F.
|