$\bf{
(1638 \pm4) \times 10^{-3}}$
|
OUR EVALUATION
$~~$(Produced by HFLAV)
|
$1.637$ $\pm0.004$ $\pm0.003$ |
|
|
|
LHCB |
$1.639$ $\pm0.009$ $\pm0.009$ |
|
1 |
|
CDF |
$1.663$ $\pm0.023$ $\pm0.015$ |
|
2 |
|
CDF |
$1.635$ $\pm0.011$ $\pm0.011$ |
|
3 |
|
BELL |
$1.624$ $\pm0.014$ $\pm0.018$ |
|
4 |
|
DLPH |
$1.636$ $\pm0.058$ $\pm0.025$ |
|
5 |
|
CDF |
$1.673$ $\pm0.032$ $\pm0.023$ |
|
6 |
|
BABR |
$1.648$ $\pm0.049$ $\pm0.035$ |
|
7 |
|
ALEP |
$1.643$ $\pm0.037$ $\pm0.025$ |
|
8 |
|
OPAL |
$1.637$ $\pm0.058$ ${}^{+0.045}_{-0.043}$ |
|
7 |
|
CDF |
$1.66$ $\pm0.06$ $\pm0.03$ |
|
8 |
|
L3 |
$1.66$ $\pm0.06$ $\pm0.05$ |
|
8 |
|
SLD |
$1.58$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.18}$ ${}^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ |
94 |
5 |
|
ALEP |
$1.61$ $\pm0.16$ $\pm0.12$ |
|
7, 9 |
|
DLPH |
$1.72$ $\pm0.08$ $\pm0.06$ |
|
10 |
|
DLPH |
$1.52$ $\pm0.14$ $\pm0.09$ |
|
7 |
|
OPAL |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$1.695$ $\pm0.026$ $\pm0.015$ |
|
6 |
|
BELL |
$1.68$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.02$ |
|
5 |
|
CDF |
$1.56$ $\pm0.13$ $\pm0.06$ |
|
7 |
|
CDF |
$1.58$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.03$ |
|
11 |
|
ALEP |
$1.58$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.04$ |
|
7 |
|
ALEP |
$1.70$ $\pm0.09$ |
|
12 |
|
DLPH |
$1.61$ $\pm0.16$ $\pm0.05$ |
148 |
5 |
|
CDF |
$1.30$ ${}^{+0.33}_{-0.29}$ $\pm0.16$ |
92 |
7 |
|
DLPH |
$1.56$ $\pm0.19$ $\pm0.13$ |
134 |
10 |
|
DLPH |
$1.51$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.28}$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.14}$ |
59 |
7 |
|
OPAL |
$1.47$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.19}$ ${}^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ |
77 |
7 |
|
ALEP |
1
Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays (${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit K}^{(*)}}$).
|
2
Measured using ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ with ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ events that were selected using a silicon vertex trigger.
|
3
Measurement performed using a combined fit of $\mathit CP$-violation, mixing and lifetimes.
|
4
Measurement performed using an inclusive reconstruction and ${{\mathit B}}$ flavor identification technique.
|
5
Measured mean life using fully reconstructed decays.
|
6
Events are selected in which one ${{\mathit B}}$ meson is fully reconstructed while the second ${{\mathit B}}~$meson is reconstructed inclusively.
|
7
Data analyzed using ${{\mathit D}}$ / ${{\mathit D}^{*}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ X event vertices.
|
8
Data analyzed using charge of secondary vertex.
|
9
ABREU 1995Q assumes B( ${{\mathit B}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{**-}}{{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}}$) = $3.2$ $\pm1.7\%$.
|
10
Data analyzed using vertex-charge technique to tag ${{\mathit B}}$ charge.
|
11
Combined result of ${{\mathit D}}/{{\mathit D}^{*}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ X analysis and fully reconstructed ${{\mathit B}}$ analysis.
|
12
Combined ABREU 1995Q and ADAM 1995 result.
|