$\bf{
12.59 \pm0.42}$
|
OUR EVALUATION
(from LEP-SLC 2006, eq. 5.39)
|
$\bf{
12.6 \pm0.4}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
|
$13.12$ $\pm0.49$ $\pm0.42$ |
|
1 |
|
OPAL |
$12.7$ $\pm1.3$ $\pm0.6$ |
|
2 |
|
DLPH |
$11.92$ $\pm0.68$ $\pm0.51$ |
|
3 |
|
L3 |
$12.1$ $\pm1.6$ $\pm0.6$ |
|
4 |
|
DLPH |
$11.4$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
5 |
|
ALEP |
$12.9$ $\pm2.2$ |
|
6 |
|
ALEP |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$13.2$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm2.4$ |
|
7 |
|
D0 |
$15.2$ $\pm0.7$ $\pm1.1$ |
|
8 |
|
CDF |
$13.1$ $\pm2.0$ $\pm1.6$ |
|
9 |
|
CDF |
$11.07$ $\pm0.62$ $\pm0.55$ |
|
10 |
|
OPAL |
$13.6$ $\pm3.7$ $\pm4.0$ |
|
11 |
|
AMY |
$14.4$ $\pm1.4$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-1.1}$ |
|
12 |
|
DLPH |
$13.1$ $\pm1.4$ |
|
13 |
|
DLPH |
$12.3$ $\pm1.2$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
|
|
L3 |
$15.7$ $\pm2.0$ $\pm3.2$ |
|
14 |
|
UA1 |
$12.1$ ${}^{+4.4}_{-4.0}$ $\pm1.7$ |
1665 |
15 |
|
DLPH |
$14.3$ ${}^{+2.2}_{-2.1}$ $\pm0.7$ |
|
16 |
|
OPAL |
$14.5$ ${}^{+4.1}_{-3.5}$ $\pm1.8$ |
|
17 |
|
OPAL |
$12.1$ $\pm1.7$ $\pm0.6$ |
|
18 |
|
L3 |
$17.6$ $\pm3.1$ $\pm3.2$ |
1112 |
19 |
|
CDF |
$14.8$ $\pm2.9$ $\pm1.7$ |
|
20 |
|
UA1 |
$13.2$ $\pm22$ ${}^{+1.5}_{-1.2}$ |
823 |
21 |
|
ALEP |
$17.8$ ${}^{+4.9}_{-4.0}$ $\pm2.0$ |
|
22 |
|
L3 |
$17$ ${}^{+15}_{-8}$ |
|
23, 24 |
|
MRK2 |
$21$ ${}^{+29}_{-15}$ |
|
23 |
|
MAC |
$>2 at 90\%\mathit CL$ |
|
23 |
|
MAC |
$12.1$ $\pm4.7$ |
|
25, 23 |
|
UA1 |
$<12 at 90\%\mathit CL$ |
|
26, 23 |
|
MRK2 |
1
The average ${{\mathit B}}$ mixing parameter is determined simultaneously with ${{\mathit b}}$ and ${{\mathit c}}$ forward-backward asymmetries in the fit.
|
2
The experimental systematic and model uncertainties are combined in quadrature.
|
3
ACCIARRI 1999D uses maximum-likelihood fits to extract ${{\mathit \chi}_{{{b}}}}$ as well as the $\mathit A{}^{{{\mathit b}}}_{\mathit FB}$ in ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ events containing prompt leptons.
|
4
This ABREU 1994J result is from 5182 ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ and 279 ${{\mathit \Lambda}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ events. The systematic error includes $0.004$ for model dependence.
|
5
BUSKULIC 1994G data analyzed using ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$, and ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ events.
|
6
BUSKULIC 1992B uses a jet charge technique combined with electrons and muons.
|
7
Uses the dimuon charge asymmetry. Averaged over the mix of ${{\mathit b}}$-flavored hadrons.
|
8
Measurement performed using events containing a dimuon or an ${{\mathit e}}/{{\mathit \mu}}$ pair.
|
9
Uses di-muon events.
|
10
ALEXANDER 1996 uses a maximum likelihood fit to simultaneously extract ${{\mathit \chi}}$ as well as the forward-backward asymmetries in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ and ${{\mathit c}}{{\overline{\mathit c}}}$.
|
11
UENO 1996 extracted $\chi $ from the energy dependence of the forward-backward asymmetry.
|
12
ABREU 1994F uses the average electric charge sum of the jets recoiling against a ${{\mathit b}}$-quark jet tagged by a high $\mathit p_{\mathit T}$ muon. The result is for ${{\overline{\mathit \chi}}}$ = ${{\mathit f}_{{{d}}}}{{\mathit \chi}_{{{d}}}}+0.9{{\mathit f}_{{{s}}}}{{\mathit \chi}_{{{s}}}}$.
|
13
This ABREU 1994J result combines ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit \Lambda}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, and jet-charge ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (ABREU 1994F) analyses. It is for ${{\overline{\mathit \chi}}}$ = $\mathit f_{\mathit d}{{\mathit \chi}_{{{d}}}}+0.96\mathit f_{\mathit s}{{\mathit \chi}_{{{s}}}}$.
|
14
ALBAJAR 1994 uses dimuon events. Not independent of ALBAJAR 1991D.
|
15
ABREU 1993C data analyzed using ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$, and ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ events.
|
16
AKERS 1993B analysis performed using dilepton events.
|
17
ACTON 1992C uses electrons and muons. Superseded by AKERS 1993B.
|
18
ADEVA 1992C uses electrons and muons.
|
19
ABE 1991G measurement of $\chi $ is done with ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ and ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}$ events.
|
20
ALBAJAR 1991D measurement of $\chi $ is done with dimuons.
|
21
DECAMP 1991 done with opposite and like-sign dileptons. Superseded by BUSKULIC 1992B.
|
22
ADEVA 1990P measurement uses ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}}$, and ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ events from 118k events at the ${{\mathit Z}}$. Superseded by ADEVA 1992C.
|
23
These experiments are not in the average because the combination of ${{\mathit B}_{{{s}}}}$ and ${{\mathit B}_{{{d}}}}$ mesons which they see could differ from those at higher energy.
|
24
The WEIR 1990 measurement supersedes the limit obtained in SCHAAD 1985. The 90$\%$ CL are $0.06$ and $0.38$.
|
25
ALBAJAR 1987C measured $\chi $ = ( ${{\overline{\mathit B}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit B}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}$ X) divided by the average production weighted semileptonic branching fraction for ${{\mathit B}}$ hadrons at 546 and 630 GeV.
|
26
Limit is average probability for hadron containing ${{\mathit B}}$ quark to produce a positive lepton.
|