${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}{(3065)}^{0}}$ MASS INSPIRE search

B175M
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 3065.58 \pm0.21}$ OUR AVERAGE
$3065.63$ $\pm0.06$ $\pm0.06$ $\pm0.23$ 15k 1
AAIJ
2023AS
 LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$3065.9$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm0.4$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.22}$ 51 2
AAIJ
2021AC
 LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$3064.9$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm0.2$ 82
YELTON
2018B
 BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
$3065.6$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm0.3$ 1.74k 3
AAIJ
2017AH
 LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
1  The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}$ mass, taken to be the PDG 2022 fit result $2467.71$ $\pm0.23$ MeV.
2  Measured via ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{b}}}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{**0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}$ mass.
3  See AAIJ 2023AS.
  References:
AAIJ 2023AS
PRL 131 131902 Observation of new $\Omega_c^{0}$ states decaying to the $\Xi_c^+K^-$ final state
AAIJ 2021AC
PR D104 L091102 Observation of excited $\Omega_c^0$ baryons in $\Omega_b^- \to \Xi_c^+ K^-\pi^-$decays
YELTON 2018B
PR D97 051102 Observation of Excited $\Omega_c$ Charmed Baryons in $e^+e^-$ Collisions
AAIJ 2017AH
PRL 118 182001 Observation of Five New Narrow ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ States Decaying to ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$