${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ MEAN LIFE INSPIRE search

S047T
VALUE ($ 10^{-15} $ s) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 274 \pm10}$ OUR AVERAGE
$276.3$ $\pm19.4$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm0.7$ 0.36k 1
AAIJ
2025AM
LHCB ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{b}}}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ , ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
$243$ $\pm48$ $\pm11$ 88
ABUDINEN
2023
BEL2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}{+}$ ${{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
$276.5$ $\pm13.4$ $\pm4.5$ 2, 3
AAIJ
2022Y
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}{{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
$268$ $\pm24$ $\pm10$ 978 2, 4
AAIJ
2018J
LHCB ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{b}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}{+}$ ${{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
$72$ $\pm11$ $\pm11$ 64
LINK
2003C
FOCS ${{\mathit \Omega}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$, ${{\mathit \Xi}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
$55$ ${}^{+13}_{-11}$ ${}^{+18}_{-23}$ 86
ADAMOVICH
1995B
WA89 ${{\mathit \Omega}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$, ${{\mathit \Xi}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
$86$ ${}^{+27}_{-20}$ $\pm28$ 25
FRABETTI
1995D
E687 ${{\mathit \Sigma}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$
1  Uses ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ , ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ as a normalization mode to minimize the uncertainties associated with the decay time acceptance. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ lifetime, which is taken to be $410.3$ $\pm1.0$ fs.
2  Recent measurements by AAIJ 2018J, AAIJ 2022Y, and ABUDINEN 2023 obtain consistent results that are nearly four times larger than the average result of previous experiments, ($69$ $\pm12$) $ \times 10^{-15}$ s. We go with the more recent results, mostly obtained with much larger data samples, and also note the positive correlation between the measured value and the inverse of the estimated statistical uncertainty in lifetime measurements.
3  AAIJ 2022Y reports this measurement as ($276.5$ $\pm13.4$ $\pm4.4$ $\pm0.7$) $ \times 10^{-15}$ s. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ lifetime ${\mathit \tau}_{{{\mathit D}^{0}}}$ = ($410.1$ $\pm1.5$) fs from PDG 2020. Measured in ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}$ produced promptly in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions, using ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ as normalisation mode.
4  Measured using ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}}$ produced in semileptonic ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{b}}}}$ decays.
  References:
AAIJ 2025AM
JHEP 2509 157 Measurement of the $?_c^0$ and $?_c^0$ baryon lifetimes using hadronic $b$-baryon decays
ABUDINEN 2023
PR D107 L031103 Measurement of the ?c0 lifetime at Belle II
AAIJ 2022Y
SCIB 67 479 Measurement of the lifetimes of promptly produced $\Omega_c^0$ and $\Xi_c^0$ baryons
AAIJ 2018J
PRL 121 092003 Measurement of the $\Omega_c^0$ baryon lifetime
LINK 2003C
PL B561 41 Measurement of the ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ Lifetime
ADAMOVICH 1995B
PL B358 151 Measurement of ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$ Lifetime
FRABETTI 1995D
PL B357 678 First Measurement of the Lifetime of the ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{0}}$