| $\bf{
4623 \pm10}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
Error includes scale factor of 3.7.
|
| $4603.1$ $\pm3.9$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
1 |
|
BES3 |
| $4584$ $\pm14$ $\pm80$ |
|
2 |
|
BES3 |
| $4708$ ${}^{+17}_{-15}$ $\pm21$ |
|
3 |
|
BES3 |
| $4701.8$ $\pm10.9$ $\pm2.7$ |
|
4 |
|
BES3 |
| $4675.3$ $\pm29.5$ $\pm3.5$ |
|
5 |
|
BES3 |
| $4651.0$ $\pm37.8$ $\pm2.1$ |
|
6 |
|
BES3 |
| $4619.8$ ${}^{+8.9}_{-8.0}$ $\pm2.3$ |
66 |
7 |
|
BELL |
| $4625.9$ ${}^{+6.2}_{-6.0}$ $\pm0.4$ |
89 |
8 |
|
BELL |
| $4652$ $\pm10$ $\pm11$ |
279 |
9 |
|
BELL |
| $4669$ $\pm21$ $\pm3$ |
37 |
10 |
|
BABR |
| $4634$ ${}^{+8}_{-7}$ ${}^{+5}_{-8}$ |
142 |
11 |
|
BELL |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $4647.9$ $\pm8.6$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
12 |
|
BES3 |
| $4652.5$ $\pm3.4$ $\pm1.1$ |
|
13 |
|
RVUE |
| $4645.2$ $\pm9.5$ $\pm6.0$ |
|
14 |
|
RVUE |
| $4646.4$ $\pm9.7$ $\pm4.8$ |
|
15 |
|
RVUE |
| $4661$ ${}^{+9}_{-8}$ $\pm6$ |
44 |
16 |
|
RVUE |
| $4664$ $\pm11$ $\pm5$ |
44 |
|
|
BELL |
|
1
Extracted in a fit that employs two BW resonances. The second one at about 4720 MeV shows low statistical significance of 2.7 $\sigma $.
|
|
2
Extracted from a fit with two BW functions. The second one located at about 4750 MeV show a low statistical significance of 4.3 $\sigma $.
|
|
3
Seen as a peak in the c.m. energy dependence of the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit J / \psi}}$ cross section using 5.85 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of data at c.m. energies $4.61 - 4.95$ GeV. Statistical significance is over 5$\sigma $.
|
|
4
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term.
|
|
5
From a cross-section measurement of ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{*0}}{{\mathit D}^{*-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) $4209.6$ $\pm7.5$ ($81.6$ $\pm19.9$) MeV and $4469.1$ $\pm26.4$ ($246.3$ $\pm37.9$) MeV.
|
|
6
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range $\sqrt {s }$ = $4.008 - 4.698$ GeV.
|
|
7
Using ${{\mathit D}_{{{s2}}}^{*}{(2573)}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ decays.
|
|
8
From a fit of a Breit-Wigner convolved with a Gaussian.
|
|
9
From a two-resonance fit. Supersedes WANG 2007D.
|
|
10
From a two-resonance fit.
|
|
11
The ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ and ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{-}}$ states are not necessarily the same.
|
|
12
From a fit to the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(3823)}}$ cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak with mass $4417.5$ $\pm26.2$ $\pm3.5$ MeV and width $245$ $\pm48$ $\pm13$ MeV.
|
|
13
The pole parameters are extracted from the speed plot.
|
|
14
From a three-resonance fit.
|
|
15
From a combined fit of BELLE, BABAR and BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit J / \psi}}$ and ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ data.
|
|
16
From a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with two resonances.
|