| $\bf{
55 \pm9}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
Error includes scale factor of 1.9.
|
| $57$ $\pm12$ $\pm219$ |
|
1 |
|
BES3 |
| $45.2$ $\pm5.7$ $\pm0.7$ |
|
2 |
|
BES3 |
| $126$ ${}^{+27}_{-23}$ $\pm30$ |
|
3 |
|
BES3 |
| $30.5$ $\pm22.3$ $\pm14.6$ |
|
4 |
|
BES3 |
| $218.3$ $\pm72.9$ $\pm9.3$ |
|
5 |
|
BES3 |
| $155.4$ $\pm24.8$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
6 |
|
BES3 |
| $47.0$ ${}^{+31.3}_{-14.8}$ $\pm4.6$ |
66 |
7 |
|
BELL |
| $49.8$ ${}^{+13.9}_{-11.5}$ $\pm4.0$ |
89 |
8 |
|
BELL |
| $68$ $\pm11$ $\pm5$ |
279 |
9 |
|
BELL |
| $104$ $\pm48$ $\pm10$ |
37 |
10 |
|
BABR |
| $92$ ${}^{+40}_{-24}$ ${}^{+10}_{-21}$ |
142 |
11 |
|
BELL |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $33.1$ $\pm18.6$ $\pm4.1$ |
|
12 |
|
BES3 |
| $62.6$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm4.3$ |
|
13 |
|
RVUE |
| $113.8$ $\pm18.1$ $\pm3.4$ |
|
14 |
|
RVUE |
| $103.5$ $\pm15.6$ $\pm4.0$ |
|
15 |
|
RVUE |
| $42$ ${}^{+17}_{-12}$ $\pm6$ |
44 |
16 |
|
RVUE |
| $48$ $\pm15$ $\pm3$ |
44 |
|
|
BELL |
|
1
Extracted from a fit with two BW functions. The second one located at about 4750 MeV show a low statistical significance of 4.3 $\sigma $.
|
|
2
Extracted in a fit that employs two BW resonances. The second one at about 4720 MeV shows low statistical significance of 2.7 $\sigma $.
|
|
3
Seen as a peak in the c.m. energy dependence of the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit J / \psi}}$ cross section using 5.85 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of data at c.m. energies $4.61 - 4.95$ GeV. Statistical significance is over 5$\sigma $.
|
|
4
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term.
|
|
5
From a cross-section measurement of ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{*0}}{{\mathit D}^{*-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) $4209.6$ $\pm7.5$ ($81.6$ $\pm19.9$) MeV and $4469.1$ $\pm26.4$ ($246.3$ $\pm37.9$) MeV.
|
|
6
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range $\sqrt {s }$ = $4.008 - 4.698$ GeV.
|
|
7
Using ${{\mathit D}_{{{s2}}}^{*}{(2573)}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ decays.
|
|
8
From a fit of a Breit-Wigner convolved with a Gaussian.
|
|
9
From a two-resonance fit. Supersedes WANG 2007D.
|
|
10
From a two-resonance fit.
|
|
11
The ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ and ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{-}}$ states are not necessarily the same.
|
|
12
From a fit to the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(3823)}}$ cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak with mass $4417.5$ $\pm26.2$ $\pm3.5$ MeV and width $245$ $\pm48$ $\pm13$ MeV.
|
|
13
The pole parameters are extracted from the speed plot.
|
|
14
From a three-resonance fit.
|
|
15
From a combined fit of BELLE, BABAR and BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit J / \psi}}$ and ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ data.
|
|
16
From a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with two resonances.
|