| $\bf{
0.5289 \pm0.0010}$
|
OUR FIT
Not assuming $\mathit CPT$
|
| $\bf{
0.5293 \pm0.0009}$
|
OUR FIT
Error includes scale factor of 1.3.
Assuming $\mathit CPT$
|
| $0.52797$ $\pm0.00195$ |
1, 2 |
|
KTEV |
| $0.52699$ $\pm0.00123$ |
1, 3 |
|
KTEV |
| $0.5240$ $\pm0.0044$ $\pm0.0033$ |
|
|
CPLR |
| $0.5297$ $\pm0.0030$ $\pm0.0022$ |
4 |
|
E773 |
| $0.5286$ $\pm0.0028$ |
5 |
|
E731 |
| $0.5257$ $\pm0.0049$ $\pm0.0021$ |
4 |
|
E731 |
| $0.5340$ $\pm0.00255$ $\pm0.0015$ |
6 |
|
SPEC |
| $0.5334$ $\pm0.0040$ $\pm0.0015$ |
6, 7 |
|
SPEC |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $0.5261$ $\pm0.0015$ |
8 |
|
KTEV |
| $0.5288$ $\pm0.0043$ |
9 |
|
KTEV |
| $0.5343$ $\pm0.0063$ $\pm0.0025$ |
10 |
|
CPLR |
| $0.5295$ $\pm0.0020$ $\pm0.0003$ |
11 |
|
CPLR |
| $0.5307$ $\pm0.0013$ |
12 |
|
RVUE |
| $0.5274$ $\pm0.0029$ $\pm0.0005$ |
11 |
|
CPLR |
| $0.482$ $\pm0.014$ |
13 |
|
SPEC |
| $0.534$ $\pm0.007$ |
14 |
|
ASPK |
| $0.542$ $\pm0.006$ |
14 |
|
ASPK |
| $0.542$ $\pm0.006$ |
|
|
CNTR |
|
1
The two ABOUZAID 2011 values use the same data. The first enters the ''assuming $\mathit CPT$'' fit and the second enters the ''not assuming $\mathit CPT$'' fit.
|
|
2
ABOUZAID 2011 fit has $\Delta \mathit m$, ${{\mathit \tau}_{{{s}}}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}_{{{\epsilon}}}}$, Re(${{\mathit \epsilon}^{\,'}}/{{\mathit \epsilon}}$), and Im(${{\mathit \epsilon}^{\,'}}/{{\mathit \epsilon}}$) as free parameters. See Im(${{\mathit \epsilon}^{\,'}}/{{\mathit \epsilon}}$) in the ''${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ $\mathit CP$ violation'' section for correlation information.
|
|
3
ABOUZAID 2011 fit has $\Delta \mathit m$ and ${{\mathit \tau}_{{{s}}}}$ free but constrains ${{\mathit \phi}_{{{\epsilon}}}}$ to the Superweak value, i.e. assumes $\mathit CPT$. See ''${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ Mean Life'' section for correlation information.
|
|
4
Fits $\Delta \mathit m$ and $\phi _{+−}$ simultaneously. GIBBONS 1993C systematic error is from B.$~$Winstein via private communication. $20 - 160$ GeV ${{\mathit K}}$ beams.
|
|
5
GIBBONS 1993 value assume $\phi _{+−}$ = $\phi _{00}$ = $\phi _{{\mathrm {SW}}}$ = ($43.7$ $\pm0.2)^\circ{}$, i.e. assumes $\mathit CPT$. $20 - 160$ GeV ${{\mathit K}}$ beams.
|
|
6
These two experiments have a common systematic error due to the uncertainty in the momentum scale, as pointed out in WAHL 1989.
|
|
7
GJESDAL 1974 uses charge asymmetry in ${{\mathit K}_{{{{{\mathit \ell}}3}}}^{0}}$ decays.
|
|
8
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit $\Delta \mathit m$ and ${\mathit \tau}_{{{\mathit K}_S^0} }$ simultaneously. $\phi _{+−}$ is constrained to the Superweak value, i.e. $\mathit CPT$ is assumed. See ``${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ Mean Life'' section for correlation information. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.
|
|
9
ALAVI-HARATI 2003 fit $\Delta \mathit m$, $\phi _{+−}$, and $\tau _{{{\mathit K}_{{{S}}}}}$ simultaneously. See $\phi _{+−}$ in the ``${{\mathit K}_{{{L}}}}$ $\mathit CP$ violation'' section for correlation information. Superseded by ABOUZAID 2011.
|
|
10
ANGELOPOULOS 2001 uses strong interactions strangeness tagging at two different times.
|
|
11
Uses ${{\overline{\mathit K}}_{{{e3}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit K}_{{{e3}}}^{0}}$ strangeness tagging at production and decay. Assumes $\mathit CPT$ conservation on $\Delta \mathit S=−\Delta \mathit Q$ transitions.
|
|
12
ADLER 1996C is the result of a fit which includes nearly the same data as entered into the ``OUR$~$FIT'' value above.
|
|
13
ARONSON 1982 find that $\Delta \mathit m$ may depend on the kaon energy.
|
|
14
ARONSON 1970 and CARNEGIE 1971 use ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ mean life = ($0.862$ $\pm0.006$) $ \times 10^{-10}$ s. We have not attempted to adjust these values for the subsequent change in the ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ mean life or in $\eta _{+−}$.
|