• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$<6.4\times 10^{2}$ |
90 |
1 |
|
ICAR |
$<150$ |
90 |
2 |
|
MBNE |
$\text{0.4 - 9.0}$ |
99 |
3 |
|
MBNE |
$\text{0.4 - 9.0}$ |
99 |
4 |
|
MBNE |
$<3.3$ |
90 |
5 |
|
MBNE |
$<1.7$ |
90 |
6 |
|
KAR2 |
$<1.1$ |
90 |
|
|
NTEV |
$5.3$ $\pm1.3$ $\pm9.0$ |
|
7 |
|
LSND |
$6.2$ $\pm2.4$ $\pm1.0$ |
|
8 |
|
LSND |
$\text{3 - 12}$ |
80 |
9 |
|
|
$<6$ |
90 |
10 |
|
|
1
ANTONELLO 2013A obtained the limit by assuming ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{e}}}}$ oscillation from the $\sim{}2\%$ of ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$ evnets contamination in the CNGS beam.
|
2
CHENG 2012 is a combined fit of MiniBooNE and SciBooNE antineutrino data.
|
3
This value is for a two neutrino oscillation analysis for excess antineutrino events with E$_{{{\mathit \nu}}}>$ 475 MeV. At 90$\%$ CL there is no solution at high $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$. The best fit is at maximal mixing. The allowed region is consistent with LSND reported by AGUILAR 2001. Supercedes AGUILAR-AREVALO 2009B.
|
4
This value is for a two neutrino oscillation analysis for excess antineutrino events with E$_{{{\mathit \nu}}}>$ 200 MeV with subtraction of the expected 12 events low energy excess seen in the neutrino component of the beam. At 90$\%$ CL there is no solution at high $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$. The best fit value is 0.007 for $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$ = 4.4 eV${}^{2}$.
|
5
This result is inconclusive with respect to small amplitude mixing suggested by LSND.
|
6
ARMBRUSTER 2002 is the final analysis of the KARMEN$~$2 data. See footnote in the preceding table for further details, and the paper for the exclusion plot.
|
7
AGUILAR 2001 is the final analysis of the LSND full data set. The deduced oscillation probability is $0.264$ $\pm0.067$ $\pm0.045\%$; the value of sin$^22\theta $ for large $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$ is twice this probability (although these values are excluded by other constraints). See footnote in preceding table for further details, and the paper for a plot showing allowed regions. Supersedes ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995, ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996, and ATHANASSOPOULOS 1998.
|
8
ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996 reports ($0.31$ $\pm0.12$ $\pm0.05)\%$ for the oscillation probability; the value of sin$^22\theta $ for large $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$ should be twice this probability. See footnote in preceding table for further details, and see the paper for a plot showing allowed regions.
|
9
ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995 error corresponds to the $1.6\sigma $ band in the plot. The expected background is $2.7$ $\pm0.4$ events. Corresponds to an oscillation probability of ($0.34$ ${}^{+0.20}_{-0.18}$ $\pm0.07)\%$. For a different interpretation, see HILL 1995. Replaced by ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996.
|
10
HILL 1995 is a report by one member of the LSND Collaboration, reporting a different conclusion from the analysis of the data of this experiment (see ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995). Contrary to the rest of the LSND Collaboration, Hill finds no evidence for the neutrino oscillation ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{e}}}}$ and obtains only upper limits.
|