| $3.8$ ${}^{+2.1}_{-3.6}$ |
|
1 |
|
ATLS |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $-11\text{ to }17 $ |
95 |
2 |
|
ATLS |
| $-1.2\text{ to }7.5 $ |
95 |
3 |
|
CMS |
| $-3.1\text{ to }9.0 $ |
95 |
4 |
|
ATLS |
| $-6.2\text{ to }11.6 $ |
95 |
5 |
|
ATLS |
| $-1.2\text{ to }7.2 $ |
95 |
1 |
|
ATLS |
| $-1.4\text{ to }6.9 $ |
95 |
6 |
|
ATLS |
| $-6.2\text{ to }13.3 $ |
95 |
7 |
|
ATLS |
| $-7.2\text{ to }13.8 $ |
95 |
8 |
|
CMS |
| $-37.7\text{ to }37.2 $ |
95 |
9 |
|
CMS |
| $-34.4\text{ to }33.3 $ |
95 |
10 |
|
ATLS |
| $-0.6\text{ to }6.6 $ |
95 |
11 |
|
ATLS |
| $-0.4\text{ to }6.3 $ |
95 |
12 |
|
ATLS |
| $-3.5\text{ to }11.3 $ |
95 |
13 |
|
ATLS |
| $-5.4\text{ to }14.9 $ |
95 |
14 |
|
CMS |
| $-9.9\text{ to }16.9 $ |
95 |
15 |
|
CMS |
| $-1.7\text{ to }8.7 $ |
95 |
16 |
|
CMS |
| $-8.8\text{ to }13.4 $ |
95 |
17 |
|
CMS |
| $-6.9\text{ to }11.1 $ |
95 |
18 |
|
CMS |
| $-1.5\text{ to }6.7 $ |
95 |
19 |
|
ATLS |
| $-1.24\text{ to }6.49 $ |
95 |
20 |
|
CMS |
| $-2.3\text{ to }9.4 $ |
95 |
21 |
|
CMS |
| $-3.3\text{ to }8.5 $ |
95 |
22 |
|
CMS |
| $-5.0\text{ to }12.0 $ |
95 |
23 |
|
ATLS |
| $-11\text{ to }17 $ |
95 |
24 |
|
CMS |
| $-11.8\text{ to }18.8 $ |
95 |
25 |
|
CMS |
| $-8.2\text{ to }13.2 $ |
95 |
26 |
|
ATLS |
|
|
27 |
|
CMS |
| $-17\text{ to }22.5 $ |
95 |
28 |
|
CMS |
|
1
AAD 2024BL combine results from $126 - 140$ fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (AAD 2023BK, AAD 2024BV), ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ (AAD 2024AZ), ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ (AAD 2024X), multilepton (AAD 2024BG), and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ (AAD 2024Y). See their Fig. 3. All other Higgs couplings are fixed to the SM values.
|
|
2
AAD 2025J search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 126 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Two-dimensional likelihood scan of (${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{3}}}}$ (=${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$), ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{4}}}}$) is shown in their Fig. 9. The quoted values are obtained by assuming ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{4}}}}$ = 1. Note that the quoted values are calculated using the kappa framework, which outside the unitarity bounds requires additional modification to preserve unitarity for their results.
|
|
3
HAYRAPETYAN 2025F constrain the Higgs trilinear self-coupling using single and double Higgs production with data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The production modes and decay channels used are listed in their Tables 1 and 2 for single- and double-Higgs, respectively. Only single- and double-Higgs channels give $-1.8$ $<$ ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$ $<$ $12.0$ and $-1.7$ $<$ ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$ $<$ $7.0$, respectively. All the other Higgs boson couplings are fixed to their SM values. Their Table 3 shows results with some of the couplings are loosened. Two-dimensional likelihood scan of (${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$, ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{t}}}}$) is shown in their Fig. 5.
|
|
4
AAD 2024AZ search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ with data of 140 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Two-dimensional exclusion regions as a function of the ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$ and ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{2V}}}}$ couplings are shown in their Fig. 9. All other Higgs couplings are fixed to the SM values.
|
|
5
AAD 2024BG search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production targeting the ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}$, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}$, ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ decay channels with data of 140 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The limits are obtained with the values of all other couplings fixed to their SM value.
|
|
6
AAD 2024X search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ with data of 140 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Two-dimensional exclusion regions as a function of the $\kappa _{\lambda }$ and $\kappa _{2V}$ couplings are shown in their Fig. 6. All other Higgs couplings are fixed to the SM values.
|
|
7
AAD 2024Y search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production in 2 ${{\mathit b}}{+}$ 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}{+}$ ${{\mathit \nu}}$s final state (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$) targeting ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ decay channels with data of 140 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. All other coupling modifiers are set to their SM values.
|
|
8
HAYRAPETYAN 2024AE search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Two-dimensional exclusion regions as a function of the ($\kappa _{\lambda }$, $\kappa _{2V}$) and ($\kappa _{\lambda }$, $\kappa _{t}$) are shown in their Figs. 13 and 15. All other Higgs couplings are fixed to the SM values.
|
|
9
HAYRAPETYAN 2024AW search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production in association with a vector boson using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The vector boson decays both leptonically ( ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and hadronically. All other Higgs couplings are fixed to the SM values. Two-dimensional exclusion regions as a function of the $\kappa _{2V}$ and $\kappa _{\lambda }$ parameters are shown in their Fig. 14, with other couplings fixed to the SM values. The best fit value is ($\kappa _{\lambda }$, $\kappa _{2V}$) = (-2.6, 10.1).
|
|
10
AAD 2023AD search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production in association with a vector boson using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 139 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The vector boson decays leptonically ( ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$). The quoted $\kappa _{\lambda }$ is measured assuming all other Higgs boson couplings are at their SM value.
|
|
11
AAD 2023AT combine results from $126 - 139$ fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (AAD 2023BK), ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ (AAD 2023Z), and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ (AAD 2022Y). The quoted values are obtained from the profile likelihood scan as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }$ as shown in their Fig. 5(a). All other coupling modifiers are assumed to have their SM values.
|
|
12
AAD 2023AT combine results from $126 - 139$ fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (AAD 2023BK), ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ (AAD 2023Z), and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ (AAD 2022Y) with single-Higgs boson analyses (${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, see their Table 1). The quoted values are obtained from the profile likelihood scan as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }$ as shown in their Fig. 5(a), assuming that all other Higgs boson couplings are at their SM values. Results with other assumptions are shown in their Table 2.
|
|
13
AAD 2023BK search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 126 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted values are obtained from the one-dimensional profile likelihood scan as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }$. See their Fig. 12 (a). The $\mu _{ggF+VBF}$ measurement for different values of $\kappa _{\lambda }$ constrains -3.9 $<$ $\kappa _{\lambda }$ $<$ 11.1 at 95$\%$ CL as shown in their Fig. 10 (a). $\kappa _{2V}$= $\kappa _{V}$=1 is assumed in both cases.
|
|
14
HAYRAPETYAN 2023 measure the cross sections for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$) using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
|
|
15
TUMASYAN 2023AE search for ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, where both ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ pairs are highly boosted, with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted $\kappa _{\lambda }$ is measured assuming all other Higgs boson couplings are at their SM values.
|
|
16
TUMASYAN 2023D search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted values are obtained from the upper limit on the ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production cross section times the ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ branching fraction for different values of $\kappa _{\lambda }$. See their Fig. 8 (left). All other coupling modifiers are assumed to be 1. In addition, two-dimensional exclusion regions as a function of the $\kappa _{\lambda }$ and $\kappa _{t}$ couplings, with $\kappa _{2V}$ = $\kappa _{V}$ = 1, are shown in their Fig. 9 (left). The one-dimensional likelihood scan as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }$ is given in their Fig 10 (left), from which a 95$\%$ confidence interval of -1.77 $<$ $\kappa _{\lambda }$ $<$ 8.73 is extracted.
|
|
17
TUMASYAN 2023AI search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ ( ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit \ell}}={{\mathit e}},{{\mathit \mu}}$) with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. See their Fig. 4.
|
|
18
TUMASYAN 2023O search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, and ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ (multilepton) with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. See their Fig. 10 for different final states and these combination. Limits are set on a variety of new-physics models using an effective field theory approach. See their Figs. 11, 12, and 13.
|
|
19
AAD 2022Y search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 139 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$ is obtained from their Fig. 12 where the theory uncertainties are not included while a negative log-likelihood scan vs. ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$is shown in their Fig. 13 with the theory uncertainties, which provides ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{\lambda}}}}$ = $2.8$ ${}^{+2.0}_{-2.2}$ for the 1$\sigma $ confidence interval.
|
|
20
CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. See their Fig. 6 (left).
|
|
21
TUMASYAN 2022AN search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 138 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The upper limit on the ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production cross section at 95$\%$ CL is shown as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }$ in their Fig. 2 (top).
|
|
22
SIRUNYAN 2021K search for non-resonant ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 137 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
|
|
23
AAD 2020C combine results of up to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ (AABOUD 2018CW, AABOUD 2018CQ, AABOUD 2019A, AABOUD 2019O, AABOUD 2018BU, and AABOUD 2019T).
|
|
24
SIRUNYAN 2019 search for ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted $\kappa _{\lambda }$ is measured assuming all other Higgs boson couplings are at their SM value.
|
|
25
SIRUNYAN 2019BE combine results of 13 TeV 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ data: SIRUNYAN 2019, SIRUNYAN 2018A, SIRUNYAN 2019AB, SIRUNYAN 2019H, and SIRUNYAN 2018F.
|
|
26
AABOUD 2018CW search for ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted $\kappa _{\lambda }$ is measured assuming all other Higgs boson couplings are at their SM value.
|
|
27
SIRUNYAN 2018A search for ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ with data of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The upper limit on production cross section times branching fraction at 95$\%$ CL is shown as a function of $\kappa _{\lambda }/\kappa _{t}$ in their Fig. 6 (top) where $\kappa _{t}$ = ${{\mathit y}_{{{t}}}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit y}_{{{t}}}}{}^{SM}$ (top Yukawa coupling ${{\mathit y}_{{{t}}}}$).
|
|
28
KHACHATRYAN 2016BQ search for ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using ${{\mathit H}}$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with data of 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV.
|
