${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ WIDTH

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:
M103W
M103W
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 88 {}^{+26}_{-21}}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 2.5.  See the ideogram below.
$32.4$ $\pm21.0$ $\pm1.8$ 1
ABLIKIM
2024AN
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$140$ $\pm36$ $\pm16$ 2
ABLIKIM
2023AX
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$191$ $\pm28$ $\pm60$ 3
ABLIKIM
2022L
 
BES3 $2.0 - 3.08$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$31.1$ ${}^{+21.1}_{-11.6}$ $\pm1.1$ 4
ABLIKIM
2021T
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \eta}}$
$149.0$ $\pm15.6$ $\pm8.9$ 5
ABLIKIM
2020M
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}^{\,'}}{{\mathit \phi}}$
$106.9$ $\pm32.1$ $\pm28.1$ 6
ABLIKIM
2020S
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$86.1$ $\pm9.2$ 7
CHEN
2025D
 
RVUE ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ , ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$
$35$ $\pm23$ 8
LICHARD
2023
 
RVUE ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(nS)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$96$ ${}^{+17}_{-14}$ $\pm9$ 9
ZHU
2023A
 
RVUE ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}$
$86$ $\pm44$ $\pm51$ 10
ABLIKIM
2021AP
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$
$104$ $\pm24$ $\pm12$ 95
ABLIKIM
2019I
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$
$139.8$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm20.6$ 11
ABLIKIM
2019L
 
BES3 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$
$104$ $\pm15$ $\pm15$ 471
ABLIKIM
2015H
 
BES3 ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$77$ $\pm15$ $\pm10$ 12, 13
LEES
2012F
 
BABR 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$192$ $\pm23$ ${}^{+25}_{-61}$ 4.8k 14
SHEN
2009
 
BELL 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$65$ $\pm23$ $\pm17$ 52
ABLIKIM
2008F
 
BES ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$
$61$ $\pm50$ $\pm13$ 483
AUBERT
2008S
 
BABR 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$71$ $\pm21$ 116 15
AUBERT
2007AK
 
BABR 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$102$ $\pm27$ 149 15
AUBERT
2007AK
 
BABR 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
$58$ $\pm16$ $\pm20$ 201 13, 16
AUBERT,BE
2006D
 
BABR 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$
1  Seen in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}^{0}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ with a significance of 3.2$\sigma $.
2  From a fit to the ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ cross section between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV with a sum of Breit-Wigner amplitude and a non-resonant contribution.
3  By a simultaneous fit of the ${{\mathit K}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(1430)}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ and ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ intermediate channels in a partial-wave analysis, assuming the same structure, modelled with a coherent sum of a nonresonant component and a resonant component by a Breit-Wigner function.
4  From a fit to the cross section below 3.5 GeV measured by BaBar and BESIII with a coherent sum of two modified Breit-Wigner amplitudes (${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$ and ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$) and a nonresonant term.
5  From a fit using a coherent sum of a phase-space modified Breit-Wigner function and a phase-space term.
6  By a simultaneous fit of the intermediate channels in a partial-wave analysis, assuming the same structure, modelled with a coherent sum of a nonresonant component and a resonant component by a Breit-Wigner function.
7  From the combined analysis of the cross sections for ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}}$ and ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ using data from ABLIKIM 2019L and ABLIKIM 2021AP. The parametrisation includes the interference between direct coupling process and resonance intermediate process with the isospin factor fixed to one. Other solutions which include additional vector resonances give $85.9$ $\pm8.6$ MeV and $86.4$ $\pm8.9$ MeV.
8  From a VDM fit to ZHU 2023 ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ data with two resonances, ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$, ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$, and a third resonance with mass $1850.7$ $\pm5.3$ MeV and width $25$ $\pm35$ MeV of 1.7 $\sigma $ statistical evidence.
9  From the analysis of the combined measurements of ${\mathit \sigma (}{{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \phi}}{)}$ from BaBar, Belle, BESIII, CMD3. The statistical significance for ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ is 7.2 $\sigma $.
10  From a fit to the cross section between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV with a sum of Breit-Wigner amplitude and a nonresonant contribution. The observed structure can be also due to ${{\mathit \rho}{(2150)}}$.
11  The observed structure can be due to both the ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ and ${{\mathit \rho}{(2150)}}$.
12  Fit includes interference with the ${{\mathit \phi}{(1680)}}$.
13  From the ${{\mathit \phi}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$ component.
14  From a fit with two incoherent Breit-Wigners.
15  From the ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit f}_{{{0}}}{(980)}}$ component.
16  Superseded by LEES 2012F.

           ${{\mathit \phi}{(2170)}}$ WIDTH (MeV)
References